Young

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grønnerød, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Young, Vol. 12, No. 1, 31-49 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1103308804039635

On the Meanings and Uses of Laughter in Research Interviews

Relationships between Interviewed Men and a Woman Interviewer

Jarna Soilevuo Grønnerød

University of Joensuu, Finland

The use of laughter is often overlooked when analysing qualitative research interviews. This article argues, however, that the analysis of laughter is valuable for two reasons. First, analysing laughter helps to describe relationships and interactions between interviewee and interviewer in a way that is sensitive to subtle changes and variations in interactive positions. Second, these relationships and interactions are also the contexts in which research data are created. A close analysis of these interactions thus helps in understanding how the data emerge. The results demonstrate the role of laughter in certain interactive patterns; for example impression management, problem revelation, coping with stress caused by the interview situation and negotiations of heterosexual tensions.The implications of these patterns for research interviews are discussed, as well as certain aspects of woman-to-man interviewing in feminist research.

Key Words: feminist methodology • gender relations • laughter • qualitative methodology • self-reflection • woman-to-man interviewing


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Qualitative ResearchHome page
T. Poso, P. Honkatukia, and L. Nyqvist
Focus groups and the study of violence
Qualitative Research, February 1, 2008; 8(1): 73 - 89.
[Abstract] [PDF]